Contemporary Oncology
eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Ethical standards and procedures Supplements Addendum Special Issues Instructions for authors Publication charge
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2026
vol. 30
 
Share:
Share:
Case report

Myelodysplastic syndrome after maintenance treatment with metronomic cyclophosphamide: weighing prolonged stable disease against late toxicity

Sara Neves Carvalho
1
,
Carolina Perez Duque
2
,
Susana Lisboa
3
,
Dulcineia Pereira
4
,
Miguel H. Abreu
1

  1. Medical Oncology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology – Porto FG, EPE, Porto, Portugal
  2. Surgical Pathology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology – Porto FG, EPE, Porto, Portugal
  3. Cancer Genetics Group of CI-IPOP, Portuguese Institute of Oncology – Porto FG, EPE, Porto, Portugal
  4. Department of Haematology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology – Porto FG, EPE, Porto, Portugal
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2026; 30 (1): 88–94
Online publish date: 2026/03/03
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

The risk of myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a rare but potentially fatal side effect following treatment with chemotherapy, particularly with alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors, and platinum compounds. In breast cancer patients, this risk is well known, although most of the evidence relates to chemotherapy that is less commonly used today [13]. We know that the therapies used increase the risk of cumulative damage to haematopoietic DNA, favouring chromosomal alterations characteristic of myelodysplastic syndromes and AML. The results of Kantarjian et al. confirmed that monosomy 7 is a characteristic cytogenetic abnormality in this context and is usually associated with a worse prognosis [46].

Metronomic chemotherapy, which consists of the continuous administration of lower doses of cytotoxic agents, is easy to administer orally and has a pleasant dosage, making the treatment a choice to offer previously poly-treated patients. And it is believed that its mechanism of action may not be related to its cytotoxic activity, but rather, for example, to its angiogenic action [7, 8].

In the case of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), strategies and data on long-term survivors who have undergone multiple treatments are scarce. A subgroup analysis of the VICTOR-6 study suggests that metronomic chemotherapy may play a role as a maintenance strategy or in situations where a rapid response is not necessary, reflecting its less aggressive profile [9, 10].

Below we report the case of a patient with advanced TNBC, who underwent subsequent treatments for low-volume disease, and after an almost complete response, began maintenance treatment with metronomic cyclophosphamide. Seven years later she developed a myelodysplastic syndrome associated with monosomy 7. This case was described according to the CARE guidelines [11].

Case report

In 2011 (baseline – month 0), a 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with breast carcinoma after mammography and breast ultrasound. She then underwent partial mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy, confirming a triple- negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast (TNBC), grade 3, with a final stage of IA (pT1cN0M0). There was no elevation of the CA 15.3 tumour marker at diagnosis. Between months 4 and 8, the patient received adjuvant treatment with FEC-D (5-fluorouracil + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + Docetaxel).

She subsequently underwent radiation treatment on the left breast for a total dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions followed by a boost of 10 Gy/5 fractions on the tumour bed (months 9 and 10). In 2012, she began surveillance. A germline DNA testing was completed to check for pathogenic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 with negative results.

In 2014 (month 37), she presented with a palpable cervical left lymph node recurrence on physical examination, associated with an elevation of the CA 15.3 tumour marker – 75.76 U/ml (normal < 25 U/ml). The re-staging with chest/abdomen/pelvic computed tomography and bone scintigraphy revealed lymph nodes metastases (left cervical, mediastinal and hilar), bone (sternum) and lung (bilateral) metastases (Figure 1, 2). A lymph node biopsy was performed, confirming the recurrence of previously treated TNBC, programmed death-ligand 1 negative (combined positive score 3) and HER2 low (immunohistochemistry 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative) (Figure 3 A–E).

Figure 1

Bone scintigraphy – peripheral radiotracer uptake in a small focal lesion located in the sternal body (metastasis) (blue arrow)

/f/fulltexts/WO/57640/WO-30-57640-g001_min.jpg
Figure 2

Computed tomography scan – multiple scattered micronodules distributed throughout both pulmonary lobes (blue arrows)

/f/fulltexts/WO/57640/WO-30-57640-g002_min.jpg
Figure 3

Histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of the primary breast tumour. A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining showing invasive ductal carcinoma with high-grade features (original magnification 100×). B) Negative expression of oestrogen receptors in immunohistochemistry (200×). C) HER2 immunohistochemistry showing equivocal membranous staining (score 2+) (200×). D) Programmed death-ligand 1 expression assessed by combined positive score of 3 (200×). E) Immunohistochemistry showing absence of androgen receptor expression (200×)

/f/fulltexts/WO/57640/WO-30-57640-g003_min.jpg

She began first-line treatment with gemcitabine/ carboplatin (month 40) (Table 1), presenting with a complete response according to RECIST 1.1 in 2015 (month 46) with normalisation of CA 15.3 (Figure 4). Two dose reductions were required due to haematological toxicity, namely persistent grade 3 neutropenia, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03. Treatment continued until 2016 (12 cycles – month 52) when disease progression was observed in a single hilar lymph node lesion and in the sternum lesion.

Table 1

Chemotherapy regimen

Chemotherapy regimenTreatment intentSchedule/cycle lengthNumber of cyclesCumulative dose
FEC-D (5-FU 500 mg/m2, Epirubicin 100 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, followed by Docetaxel 100 mg/m2), ivAdjuvantEvery 21 days3 FEC + 3 Docetaxel5-FU: 2550 mg
Epirubicin: 510 mg
Cyclophosphamide: 2550 mg
Docetaxel: 510 mg
Carboplatin + Gemcitabine (reduced dose: Carboplatin AUC 1.2; Gemcitabine 600 mg/m2), ivPalliative (1st line)Day 1 and day 8 every 21 days12 cyclesCarboplatin: 3956 mg
Gemcitabine: 27.520 mg
Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, ivPalliative (2nd line)Day 1, day 8, day 15 every 28 days7 cycles2688 mg
Cyclophosphamide 50 mg (oral)Palliative – maintenanceContinuous daily dosing7 years127.350 mg

[i] 5-FU – 5-fluorouracil, FEC-D – 5-fluorouracil + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + Docetaxel

Figure 4

Kinetics of the tumour marker CA 15.3 over time

/f/fulltexts/WO/57640/WO-30-57640-g004_min.jpg

She began a second line of palliative treatment with weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (D1, D8, D15, every 28 days) (Table 1), which was performed for 7 months, with the disease remaining stable according to RECIST 1.1. However the patient developed persistent grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (CTCAE v4.03).

At that time, given that the only measurable disease was a lesion in the sternum, and after discussion in a multidisciplinary group, it was proposed to perform cryoablation of the bone lesion, followed by maintenance treatment with metronomic cyclophosphamide (50 mg oral daily). The patient began this metronomic treatment in 2016 (month 60) (Table 1), and in the multiple subsequent radiological reassessments, she always maintained complete response criteria and good clinical and analytical tolerance, until 2020 (Month 109). At that time the patient developed sustained thrombocytopenia, initially Grade 1 (CTCAE v5), which progressed to Grade 2 (Figure 5) . In 2023 (month 144), a Grade 2 anaemia was also documented.

Figure 5

Graphical representation of haematological toxicity, as reflected by anaemia and thrombocytopenia, from the start of oral cyclophosphamide treatment

/f/fulltexts/WO/57640/WO-30-57640-g005_min.jpg

She was referred to the haematology department for further investigation, which included extensive laboratory tests that identified Grade 1 vitamin deficiency, Helicobacter pylori infection, and previous hepatitis C virus infection (without active viral load). A bone marrow aspiration was performed, which showed trilineal dysplasia without excess blasts, with normal immunophenotyping. The cytogenetic study identified the presence of monosomy of chromosome 7 (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of bone marrow cells (FISH). A) Conventional karyotype analysis showing no additional numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities. B) Interphase FISH analysis using probes targeting chromosome 7 (D7Z1/CUX1/CUL1), demonstrating loss of one signal in a subset of nuclei, consistent with monosomy 7

Detected in 15% of the analysed cells, exceeding the technical detection threshold (10%).

/f/fulltexts/WO/57640/WO-30-57640-g006_min.jpg

Following these results, it was possible to establish a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome associated with monosomy of chromosome 7, low risk, IPSS-R 2.8 (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System), of multifactorial cause but with a primary contribution from prolonged exposure to chemotherapy. The patient also underwent eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and began correction of identified vitamin deficiencies.

It was decided to suspend cyclophosphamide (month 147) to prevent worsening bicytopenia in a patient who had been disease-free for several years. She remained under haematological surveillance, having recovered from anaemia in September 2024 and from thrombocytopenia in April 2025. She currently remains without evidence of disease progression. The course of the disease is presented in Figure 7, and the cumulative doses of all treatments are described in Table 1.

Figure 7

Timeline of the patient’s clinical course, showing treatments, disease response and key events over time

CT – computed tomography, FEC-D – 5-fluorouracil + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + Docetaxel, MC – metronomic cyclophosphamide, TNBC – triple-negative breast cancer

It is expressed in months from baseline.

/f/fulltexts/WO/57640/WO-30-57640-g007_min.jpg

Discussion

The risk of developing therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) increases with cumulative exposure to DNA-damaging agents, particularly alkylators and platinum compounds. Monosomy 7, as identified in this patient, is a typical cytogenetic hallmark of treatment- related disease and is associated with adverse prognostic implications [12, 13]. In metastatic TNBC, where long-term survival is uncommon, the evidence supporting prolonged maintenance strategies is scarce, and there are no established recommendations regarding the duration of metronomic treatments [14, 15].

This case highlights three clinically relevant aspects. First, the patient experienced an unusually durable disease control, maintaining a complete response for several years in a biologically aggressive subtype. Such long-lasting stability is rarely observed in advanced TNBC and raises the question of whether continuous exposure to maintenance chemotherapy is necessary once sustained remission is achieved [15], but also if biological differences between triple-negative tumours could perhaps justify this behaviour.

Second, the emergence of late-onset bicytopenia and subsequent diagnosis of t-MDS is consistent with cumulative, chemotherapy-related toxicity. Although the impact of prolonged daily cyclophosphamide administered over several years cannot be ruled out, its relative significance compared with prior cytotoxic exposures cannot be ascertained.

While blood counts improved following the discontinuation of metronomic cyclophosphamide, this should not be taken as proof of clonal regression or the reversibility of myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematological improvement is a distinct response domain from cytogenetic response, and no follow-up cytogenetic or FISH analyses were performed given the partial recovery of cytopenias. This represents a limitation of the present report.

The challenge lies in balancing the perceived benefit of extended maintenance therapy against the risk of late toxicity, particularly in patients who exceed expected survival benchmarks. Although metronomic regimens are generally considered less intensive, their long-term safety is insufficiently characterized, as few patients receive these agents for many consecutive years [14, 16, 17]. While a direct causal relationship cannot be established, prolonged maintenance with daily cyclophosphamide was temporally associated with the haematological abnormalities observed in this patient. This case provides supportive evidence that metronomic chemotherapy, even when administered at low doses, may be clinically relevant for patients with a history of cumulative exposure to cytotoxic agents.

In this context, treatment decisions should be individualized, incorporating disease burden, treatment tolerance, expected benefit, and patient preferences. Importantly, the absence of measurable disease for an extended period underscores the need for regular reassessment of the indication for ongoing therapy. In long-term responders, particularly when no measurable disease persists, the role of continuous metronomic chemotherapy becomes uncertain.

Treatment holidays may be considered to mitigate cumulative toxicity without compromising disease control, however, we tend to avoid it for fear of the rapid progression typical of triple-negative aggressiveness. Shared decision-making remains essential, especially when the therapeutic intent is palliative and the equilibrium between quality of life and late toxicities becomes increasingly delicate [15, 16].

Third, although prolonged exposure to alkylating agents is a well-established risk factor for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, persistent cytopenias are non-specific findings. A comprehensive evaluation is required to rule out or address other possible causes, such as nutritional deficiencies, chronic infections, autoimmune cytopenias, liver disease or drug-induced bone marrow suppression [18]. This diagnostic challenge is particularly relevant in long-term survivors of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, as prolonged survival allows late treatment-related toxicities to emerge and alternative, potentially reversible causes of cytopenia to coexist. In this patient, identifying vitamin deficiencies, a Helicobacter pylori infection and past hepatitis C exposure highlights the importance of considering a wide range of possible causes of cytopenia before attributing it solely to chemotherapy-related toxicity.

To our knowledge, there is very little published data on t-MDS in long-term survivors of metastatic TNBC who have undergone prolonged metronomic chemotherapy. This reflects the uncommon nature of prolonged survival in this biologically aggressive subtype.

Conclusions

This case highlights the exceptional clinical course of a patient with metastatic TNBC who achieved long-term disease control. This scenario remains rare and is not well characterised in the literature.

This report illustrates that while metronomic cyclophosphamide may offer prolonged disease control in selected patients with metastatic TNBC, sustained exposure to alkylating agents may be associated with clinically relevant late haematological toxicity. The emergence of therapy- related MDS after several years of treatment underscores the need for regular haematological monitoring and periodic reassessment of the ongoing indication for maintenance therapy. In the absence of evidence-based recommendations regarding treatment duration in long-term responders, decisions should be individualized and grounded in shared decision-making, weighing the potential benefits of continued therapy against the cumulative risks and the overall impact on quality of life. Furthermore, persistent cytopenias should prompt an evaluation of alternative, potentially reversible causes, rather than being solely attributed to chemotherapy-induced toxicity.

Disclosures

  1. Institutional review board statement: Not applicable.

  2. Assistance with the article: None.

  3. Financial support and sponsorship: None.

  4. Conflicts of interest: None.

References

1 

McNerney ME, Godley LA, Le Beau MM. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: when genetics and environment collide. Nat Rev Cancer 2017; 17: 513-527.

2 

Curtis RE, Boice Jr JD, Stovall M, Bernstein L, Greenberg RS, Flannery JT, et al. Risk of leukemia after chemotherapy and radiation treatment for breast cancer. N En J Med 1992; 326: 1745-1751.

3 

Morton LM, Dores GM, Tucker MA, Kim CJ, Onel K, Gilbert ES, et al. Evolving risk of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia following cancer chemotherapy among adults in the United States, 1975-2008. Blood 2013; 121: 2996-3004.

4 

Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Philip P, Mortensen BT, Ersbøll J, Jensen G, Panduro J, et al. Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, preleukemia, and acute myeloproliferative syndrome secondary to treatment of other malignant diseases. Clinical and cytogenetic characteristics and results of in vitro culture of bone marrow and HLA typing. Blood 1981; 57: 712-723.

5 

Kantarjian HM, Keating M, Walters R, Smith T, Cork A, McCredie K, et al. Therapy-related leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: clinical, cytogenetic, and prognostic features. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1748-1757.

6 

Praga C, Bergh J, Bliss J, Bonneterre J, Cesana B, Coombes RC, et al. Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in trials of adjuvant epirubicin for early breast cancer: correlation with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4179-4191.

7 

Hanahan D, Bergers G, Bergsland E. Less is more, regularly: metronomic dosing of cytotoxic drugs can target tumor angiogenesis in mice. J Clin Invest 2000; 105: 1045-1047.

8 

Krajnak S, Battista MJ, Hasenburg A, Schmidt M. Metronomic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Oncol Res Treat 2022; 45: 12-17.

9 

Cazzaniga M, Cortesi L, Ferzi A, Scaltriti L, Cicchiello F, Ciccarese M, et al. Metronomic chemotherapy in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer: the future is now? Int J Breast Cancer 2017; 2017: 1683060.

10 

Cazzaniga M, Vallini I, Montagna E, Amoroso D, Berardi R, Butera A, et al. Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients: results of the VICTOR-6 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 190: 415-424.

11 

Gagnier JJ, Riley D, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Kienle G. The CARE Guidelines. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2013; 110: 603-608.

12 

Haase D, Germing U, Schanz J, Pfeilstöcker M, Nösslinger T, Hildebrandt B, et al. New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients. Blood 2007; 110: 4385-4395.

13 

Haase D. Cytogenetic features in myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol 2008; 87: 515-526.

14 

Montagna E, Pagan E, Cancello G, Sangalli C, Bagnardi V, Munzo-ne E, et al. The prolonged clinical benefit with metronomic chemotherapy (VEX regimen) in metastatic breast cancer patients. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2022; 33: e628-e34.

15 

Orlando L, Cardillo A, Rocca A, Balduzzi A, Ghisini R, Peruzzotti G, et al. Prolonged clinical benefit with metronomic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2006; 17: 961-967.

16 

Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, Papadopoulos E, Aapro M, André F, et al. 4th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 1634-1657.

17 

Cazzaniga ME, Capici S, Cordani N, Cogliati V, Pepe FF, Riva F, et al. Metronomic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer treatment: clinical and preclinical data between lights and sha-dows. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 4710.

18 

Greenberg PL, Stone RM, Abaza Y, Al-Kali A, Anand S, Ball B, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 2.2025: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2025; 23: 66-75.

Copyright: © 2026 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.