|
Current issue
Archive
Online First
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Ethical standards and procedures
Special Issues
Instructions for authors
Publication charge
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
5/2012
vol. 11 abstract:
Original paper
Quality of nurses’ working life in the perimenopausal period: influence of selected factors of work environment in medical institutions
Iwona Nowakowska
,
Renata Rasińska
,
Maria Danuta Głowacka
Przegląd Menopauzalny 2012; 5: 417–422
Online publish date: 2012/11/04
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction: An uneasy period in women’s lives, which is perimenopause, is associated with the appearance of symptoms and behavioural changes characteristic of menopause. It is also a time of professional activity. The analysis of factors in the work process may contribute to the improvement of work organisation and the increase in quality of work and professional satisfaction, despite the presence of symptoms associated with menopause.
Objective: to present opinions of professionally active nurses in the perimenopausal period on the assessment of quality of working life from the point of view of selected factors of work environment and their self-efficacy. Material and methods: The study covered 169 nurses in the perimenopausal period, working in hospital wards in two provinces. In order to obtain the research material, a survey was conducted by means of a questionnaire prepared by the authors (questions concerning opinions on selected factors of work environment related to the work organisation) and the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). To analyse the empirical material, a statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics 19 was used. χ² test and the Yule’s j coefficient were used, at a significance level p < 0.01. Results: There is a strong relationship between the evaluation of nurses’ work organisation and the atmosphere in the workplace (χ² = 45.737, j = 0.520), performing tasks in teams (χ² = 72.090, j = 0.653), number of staff on duty in relation to needs (χ² = 59.131, j = 0.592), equipment in the workplace (χ² = 70.973, j = 0.648) and participation in decision-making processes (χ² = 58.209, j = 0.587), and also the opportunities for professional development and promotion (χ² = 51.568, j = 0.552). Most women highly evaluated their self-efficacy, despite different perception of organisational factors in the hospital (χ² = 9.492). Conclusions: Evaluation of work organisation of nurses in the perimenopausal period depends on selected determinants of the work environment. Among the respondents aged 41-55, there was no relationship between work organisation and evaluation of self-efficacy. keywords:
quality of nursing work life, perimenopausal period, work environment |