Advances in Interventional Cardiology
eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current Issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Ethical standards and procedures Instructions for authors Publication charge
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2026
vol. 22
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

The relationship between the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, occurrence of contrast-induced nephropathy, and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes

Janusz Sielski
1, 2
,
Karol Kaziród-Wolski
1, 2
,
Aleksandra M. Piotrowska
1
,
Kamil Salwa
1, 2
,
Lena Merchel
1
,
Bartłomiej Jurczak
1
,
Anna Klasa
1
,
Kacper Kozieł
1
,
Maciej Ludew
1
,
Filip Maj
1
,
Kamil Pytlak
1, 2
,
Zbigniew Siudak
1

  1. Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
  2. Świetokrzyskie Cardiology Center, Kielce, Poland
Adv Interv Cardiol 2026; 22, 1 (83): 21–28
Online publish date: 2025/11/20
Article file
Get citation
 
 

Summary

The authors concluded that a high Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is associated with a higher incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, hospitalizations, and deaths in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A FIB-4 index ≥ 3.25 is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality. FIB-4 may therefore serve as a simple, non-invasive marker integrating hepatic and systemic factors that contribute to poor prognosis in ACS.

Introduction

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain one of the leading causes of hospitalization and mortality worldwide. Despite significant advances in interventional treatment and pharmacotherapy, ACS patients remain at high risk of complications and increased short- and long-term mortality. One of the important complications in this group of patients is contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), which may occur after diagnostic or therapeutic procedures involving contrast agents. The occurrence of CIN is associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity, and higher mortality [1]. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the use of indices derived from routine laboratory tests for the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Numerous hematological and biochemical markers that reflect chronic inflammation and may have prognostic value in ACS have been described in the literature, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [2], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) [3], monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (MHR) [4], and red cell distribution width (RDW) [5, 6]. These indices are simple to calculate, inexpensive, and widely available, making them attractive tools in clinical practice. RDW, in particular, has recently gained considerable attention. Elevated RDW in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has been shown to be an independent predictor of long-term mortality [5], and a meta-analysis confirmed its prognostic value in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [6]. The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, calculated from patient age, platelet count, and aminotransferase (AST, ALT) activity, was originally developed for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis but has also been applied in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and chronic hepatitis C. Growing evidence suggests that FIB-4 is associated with the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality [7, 8], which may be explained by chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and concomitant multiorgan damage. Some studies have also shown that combining FIB-4 with other inflammatory markers, such as NLR, may improve prognostic performance in coronary artery disease [7].

Aim

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the FIB-4 index and the incidence of CIN, as well as 30-day and 365-day mortality, in patients hospitalized for ACS.

Material and methods

Study population

This retrospective, single-center study analyzed patients hospitalized due to ACS who underwent coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. Data were compiled from three independent sources: the national ORPKI Registry, medical documentation from the Regional Hospital in Kielce, and follow-up information on hospitalizations and mortality provided by the Świętokrzyskie branch of the National Health Fund (NFZ).

From hospital medical records, the following baseline laboratory data were obtained: complete blood count, renal and liver function tests (urea, creatinine, alanine and aspartate aminotransferase), electrolytes, glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), lipid profile, and cardiac troponin. Additional angiographic and procedural information was extracted from the ORPKI Registry database.

Definitions and procedures

CIN was defined as a relative increase in serum creatinine of at least 25% from baseline or an absolute rise of ≥ 0.5 mg/dl (44 µmol/l) within 48 h after contrast administration [9]. All laboratory values were obtained at baseline, defined as the pre-procedural measurement. Contrast agent volume was recorded in milliliters (ml) and, when applicable, normalized to body weight (ml/kg). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, consistent with standard practice at our institution. The FIB-4 index was calculated using the standard formula: FIB-4 = (age [years] × AST [U/l])/(platelet count [109/l] × √ALT [U/l]).

All coronary procedures were performed using non-ionic, iso-osmolar contrast media – iomeprol (350 mg/ml), iodixanol (270 mg/ml), or iopromide (370 mg/ml). Clinical management followed contemporary European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines [10, 11].

The choice of vascular access (radial or femoral) was determined individually by the interventional cardiologist, taking into account the patient’s anatomy, hemodynamic status, and urgency of the procedure. In emergency cases, such as cardiogenic shock, the approach was selected at the operator’s discretion. The type of vascular access may therefore differ between patient groups, and this was beyond the control of the investigators. Generally, radial access is associated with reduced periprocedural and post-procedural mortality.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were reported as means with standard deviations (SD) if normally distributed, or as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) otherwise. Categorical variables were presented as absolute numbers and percentages. Comparisons between groups were made using the c2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied for continuous, non-normally distributed variables, while one-way ANOVA was used for variables following a normal distribution. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with 30-day and 365-day mortality. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the effect of variables on survival time, with results reported as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multivariable analyses employed stepwise forward selection methods. Candidate covariates included demographic variables (age, gender), comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]), laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red and white blood cell count, platelets, troponin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein [HDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, ALT, AST, sodium, potassium, baseline eGFR), procedural variables (contrast volume, contrast volume per kg), and clinical scores (FIB-4, triglyceride-glucose [TyG] index).

Variables were coded as binary or categorical, and continuous variables were standardized for interpretability (e.g., platelets per 25 G/l, troponin per 100 ng/l, total cholesterol per 10 mg/dl). Univariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed for all candidate variables. Variables with p < 0.005 in univariable analyses were considered for multivariable modeling. Forward selection added variables stepwise based on statistical significance and HR, with a maximum of one variable per 10 events to reduce overfitting. Collinearity was minimized through dummy coding of categorical variables and iterative selection.

Age was not included in multivariable models due to collinearity with FIB-4. All predictors were measured at baseline. Model discrimination was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival across FIB-4 groups. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided p-value < 0.05. All analyses were performed using Python (version 3.12).

Results

A total of 1465 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Based on the FIB-4 index, participants were categorized into three strata: < 1.45, 1.45–3.25, and ≥ 3.25.

Marked differences were found among these groups in demographic and clinical profiles. Patients with higher FIB-4 values tended to be older and of lower body weight. Significant variability was also observed in the prevalence of dyslipidemia, smoking habits, and baseline laboratory results, including urea, glucose, hemoglobin, troponin T, and liver enzyme levels. Procedural parameters, such as contrast volume, as well as renal function indices (eGFR and serum creatinine), also differed significantly between the groups.

Individuals with FIB-4 ≥ 3.25 represented the most clinically vulnerable subgroup, characterized by the oldest median age, the highest incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (10.0%), and increased mortality at both 30 days (8.0%) and 1 year (18.1%). The same group also exhibited the highest composite rates of death or rehospitalization at 30 days (9.6%) and 1 year (30.5%). An overview of the study cohort is provided in Table I, while Figure 1 displays Kaplan-Meier curves showing significant separation of survival trajectories across FIB-4 categories. In multivariable models, factors associated with 30-day mortality included a history of stroke (HR > 6), occurrence of CIN (HR > 6), membership of the high FIB-4 index group (HR > 3.5), and hs-TnT levels, with a 3% increase in mortality for each 100 ng/l increase. The discriminative ability of the full model achieved a concordance index of 0.772, compared to 0.637 for the model not including FIB-4 > 3.25, yielding a Dc-index of 0.135 (Table II). For 1-year mortality, multivariable analysis identified male gender (HR = 1.97), high FIB-4 (≥ 3.25, HR = 2.21), and CIN (HR = 2.76) as independent risk factors. Protective factors included higher body weight (HR = 0.98/kg), higher hematocrit (HR = 0.94/%), and baseline eGFR (HR 0.98/ml/min/1.73 m2). The full Cox model achieved a concordance index (c-index) of 0.759, compared to 0.746 for the model not including FIB-4 > 3.25 (Dc-index = 0.013). Continuous residual FIB-4 remained an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (HR 1.08 per unit, 95% CI: 1.04–1.13, p < 0.001), confirming that its prognostic value is not solely driven by age or platelet count (Table III).

Table I

Descriptive characteristics according to FIB-4 index groups

Variable< 1.45 (n = 480)1.45–3.25 (n = 735)≥ 3.25 (n = 249)Total (n = 1464)P-value
Age [years]61 (55–67)70 (62–77)72 (64–80)67 (60–75)< 0.001
Age > 69 years, n (%)82 (17.1)384 (52.2)149 (59.8)615 (42.0)< 0.001
Male sex, n (%)310 (64.6)453 (61.6)161 (64.7)924 (63.1)0.5
Body weight [kg]80 (70–90)79 (68–90)77 (69–85)79 (69–90)0.016
Diabetes, n (%)83 (17.3)137 (18.6)43 (17.3)263 (18.0)0.8
Dyslipidemia, n (%)266 (55.4)322 (43.8)91 (36.5)679 (46.4)< 0.001
TyG index (unitless)8.9 (8.5–9.4)8.8 (8.4–9.2)8.9 (8.5–9.4)8.8 (8.5–9.3)0.001
Contrast volume [ml]110 (80–180)120 (80–200)150 (90–200)120 (80–200)0.006
Contrast volume per kg [ml/kg]1.5 (1.0–2.2)1.6 (1.1–2.5)1.9 (1.2–2.9)1.6 (1.1–2.5)< 0.001
Previous stroke, n (%)18 (3.8)22 (3.0)6 (2.4)46 (3.1)0.58
Previous PCI, n (%)91 (19.0)160 (21.8)49 (19.7)300 (20.5)0.47
Previous CABG, n (%)19 (4.0)54 (7.3)17 (6.8)90 (6.1)0.049
Smoking status, n (%)120 (25.0)107 (14.6)48 (19.3)275 (18.8)< 0.001
Hypertension, n (%)329 (68.5)520 (70.7)187 (75.1)1036 (70.8)0.18
COPD, n (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.4)1 (0.1)0.09
Vascular access (other), n (%)109 (23.2)203 (28.1)97 (39.8)409 (28.5)< 0.001
Vascular access (radial), n (%)361 (76.8)519 (71.9)147 (60.2)1027 (71.5)< 0.001
Urea [mg/dl]40 (32–50)41 (33–54)38 (31–48)< 0.001
Glucose on admission [mg/dl]111 (93–148)108 (93–137)132 (104–186)112 (94–149)< 0.001
Hemoglobin [g/dl]14.1 (12.9–15.0)13.8 (12.6–14.7)13.3 (12.3–14.6)13.9 (12.6–14.8)< 0.001
Hematocrit (%)41.5 (38.2–44.1)40.5 (37.3–43.1)39.3 (36.3–43.7)40.8 (37.4–43.7)< 0.001
Red blood cell count [T/l]4.7 (4.2–5.0)4.6 (4.2–4.8)4.4 (4.1–4.8)4.6 (4.2–4.9)< 0.001
White blood cell count [G/l]8.6 (7.2–10.2)7.8 (6.4–9.7)9.1 (6.9–11.8)8.2 (6.8–10.2)< 0.001
Platelets [G/l]263 (231–306)207 (178–240)176 (146–216)221 (184–263)< 0.001
hs-TnT [ng/l]16 (8–66)30 (11–134)431 (87–1082)35 (10–185)< 0.001
Total cholesterol [mg/dl]181 (152–225)174 (144–206)165 (133–198)175 (145–212)< 0.001
HDL cholesterol [mg/dl]43 (36–51)43 (37–51)42 (35–51)43 (36–51)0.39
Non-HDL cholesterol [mg/dl]138 (110–176)128 (102–162)123 (92–156)130 (103–165)< 0.001
LDL cholesterol [mg/dl]112 (84–148)104 (76–134)101 (71–131)106 (77–138)< 0.001
Triglycerides [mg/dl]130 (98–176)116 (88–156)105 (80–141)118 (90–161)< 0.001
ALT [U/l]25 (19–37)23 (16–34)30 (19–49)25 (18–36)< 0.001
AST [U/l]24 (19–29)28 (23–38)67 (40–124)28 (22–42)< 0.001
Sodium [mmol/l]140.0 (138.0–141.0)140.0 (138.0–141.0)139.0 (137.0–141.0)140.0 (138.0–141.0)0.045
Potassium [mmol/l]4.3 (4.1–4.6)4.3 (4.0–4.6)4.3 (3.9–4.6)4.3 (4.0–4.6)0.27
Baseline eGFR [ml/min/1.73 m2]69 (60–78)62 (51–72)61 (48–71)64 (53–74)< 0.001
Creatinine before procedure [mg/dl]1.0 (0.9–1.1)1.1 (0.9–1.2)1.1 (0.9–1.3)1.1 (0.9–1.2)< 0.001
CIN, n (%)23 (4.8)43 (5.9)25 (10.0)91 (6.2)0.018
Death in 30 days, n (%)9 (1.9)13 (1.8)20 (8.0)42 (2.9)< 0.001
Death in 365 days, n (%)25 (5.2)49 (6.7)45 (18.1)119 (8.1)< 0.001
Death or hospitalization in 30 days, n (%)15 (3.1)26 (3.5)24 (9.6)65 (4.4)< 0.001
Death or hospitalization in 365 days, n (%)61 (12.7)149 (20.3)76 (30.5)286 (19.5)< 0.001

[i] ALT – alanine aminotransferase, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, CABG – coronary artery bypass grafting, CIN – contrast-induced nephropathy, eGFR – estimated glomerular filtration rate, FIB-4 – Fibrosis-4 index, HDL – high-density lipoprotein, LDL – low-density lipoprotein, PCI – percutaneous coronary intervention, TyG index – triglyceride-glucose index, Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dl and/or triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dl, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Table II

Factors affecting death in 30 days

ParameterUnivariableMultivariable (forward)
HR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age > 70 years2.631.34–5.170.005NA
Gender [male]0.840.44–1.610.595NA
Weight [kg]0.980.96–1.000.047NA
Diabetes [yes]0.590.22–1.600.300NA
Smoking [yes]0.880.38–2.080.779NA
Hypertension [yes]1.420.66–3.050.368NA
Dyslipidemia [yes]0.240.10–0.54< 0.001NA
TyG index1.350.83–2.190.224NA
Contrast volume [per 5 ml increase]0.990.98–1.010.588NA
Contrast volume [per 10 ml/kg increase]1.310.09–19.150.842NA
Previous stroke [yes]5.192.02–13.36< 0.0016.322.62–15.25< 0.001
Previous PCI [yes]0.640.26–1.590.33NA
Glucose level on admission [per 10 mg/dl increase]1.061.04–1.09< 0.001NA
Hematocrit (%)0.90.85–0.95< 0.001NA
Red blood cell count [T/l]0.470.29–0.760.002NA
White blood cell count [G/l]1.011.00–1.030.1NA
Platelets [per 25 G/l increase]0.920.80–1.040.18NA
hs-TnT [per 100 ng/l increase]1.031.02–1.05< 0.0011.031.01–1.050.003
Total cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.920.86–0.990.022NA
HDL cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.980.95–1.010.15NA
Non-HDL cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.920.85–0.990.04NA
LDL cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.990.98–1.000.05NA
Triglycerides [per 10 md/dl increase]10.96–1.040.83NA
ALT [U/l]0.340.33–0.35< 0.001NA
AST [U/l]0.450.44–0.47< 0.001NA
Sodium [mmol/l]0.850.79–0.92< 0.001NA
Potassium [mmol/l]1.510.77–2.970.23NA
Baseline eGFR [ml/min/1.73 m2]0.960.95–0.98< 0.001NA
CIN [yes]6.223.00–12.89< 0.0016.153.18–11.92< 0.001
FIB 4 index 1.45–3.250.450.23–0.900.023NA
FIB 4 index ≥ 3.254.822.53–9.20< 0.0013.51.84–6.67< 0.001
CABG [yes]0.880.22–3.550.86NA
Hemoglobin [g/dl]0.730.63–0.85< 0.001NA
Baseline eGFR < 30 [ml/min/1.73 m2]5.472.12–14.08< 0.001NA
Baseline eGFR 30–60 [ml/min/1.73 m2]1.70.90–3.240.1NA

[i] ALT – alanine aminotransferase, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, CABG – coronary artery bypass grafting, CIN – contrast-induced nephropathy, eGFR – estimated glomerular filtration rate, FIB-4 – Fibrosis-4 index, HDL – high-density lipoprotein, LDL – low-density lipoprotein, PCI – percutaneous coronary intervention, TyG index – triglyceride-glucose index, Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dl and/or triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dl, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Table III

Factors affecting death in 365 days

ParameterUnivariableMultivariable (forward)
HR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age > 70 years2.341.63–3.37< 0.001NA
Gender [male]1.10.76–1.600.61.971.32–2.94< 0.001
Weight [kg]0.980.97–0.99< 0.0010.980.97–0.990.001
Diabetes [yes]1.090.70–1.710.7NA
Smoking [yes]0.940.59–1.490.8NA
Hypertension [yes]1.220.82–1.830.33NA
Dyslipidemia [yes]0.570.40–0.830.003NA
TyG index1.010.76–1.340.97NA
Contrast volume [per 5 ml increase]10.99–1.010.46NA
Contrast volume [per 10 ml/kg increase]1.830.43–7.710.41NA
Previous stroke [yes]2.491.22–5.090.013NA
Previous PCI [yes]0.70.43–1.130.14NA
Glucose level on admission [per 10 mg/dl increase]1.041.02–1.06< 0.001NA
Hematocrit (%)0.910.88–0.94< 0.0010.940.91–0.97< 0.001
Red blood cell count [T/l]0.470.36–0.62< 0.001NA
White blood cell count [G/l]1.011.00–1.020.010NA
Platelets [per 25 G/l increase]0.970.91–1.040.41NA
hs-TnT [per 100 ng/l increase]1.021.01–1.03< 0.001NA
Total cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.950.92–0.990.008NA
HDL cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.990.97–1.000.07NA
Non-HDL cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.950.91–0.990.016NA
LDL cholesterol [per 10 mg/dl increase]10.99–1.000.04NA
Triglycerides [per 10 mg/dl increase]0.970.95–1.000.06NA
ALT [U/l]11.00–1.000.002NA
AST [U/l]0.80.79–0.80< 0.001NA
Sodium [mmol/l]0.90.86–0.95< 0.001NA
Potassium [mmol/l]1.230.84–1.810.28NA
Baseline eGFR [ml/min/1.73 m2]0.970.96–0.98< 0.0010.980.97–0.99< 0.001
CIN [yes]2.931.75–4.90< 0.0012.761.74–4.37< 0.001
FIB4 index 1.45–3.250.720.50–1.030.07NA
FIB4 index ≥3.252.861.96–4.17< 0.0012.211.51–3.22< 0.001
CABG [yes]0.620.26–1.470.28NA
Hemoglobin [g/dl]0.760.69–0.83< 0.001NA
Baseline eGFR < 30 [ml/min/1.73 m2]3.872.07–7.23< 0.001NA
Baseline eGFR 30–60 [ml/min/1.73 m2]1.751.23–2.500.002NA

[i] ALT – alanine aminotransferase, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, CABG – coronary artery bypass grafting, CIN – contrast-induced nephropathy, eGFR – estimated glomerular filtration rate, FIB-4 – Fibrosis-4 index, HDL – high-density lipoprotein, LDL – low-density lipoprotein, PCI – percutaneous coronary intervention, TyG index – triglyceride-glucose index, Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dl and/or triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dl, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Figure 1

Survival probability according to Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) groups

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/57150/PWKI-22-1-57150-g001_min.jpg

Discussion

According to the most recent report from the ORPKI registry, the total number of coronary angiography procedures in Poland increased by approximately 3% in 2023 compared with 2022, reaching over 157,000 interventions nationwide [12]. Of these, 91,381 were PCI procedures, representing a slight annual increase of 0.5% [13].

The growing number of invasive procedures underscores the clinical relevance of post-procedural complications such as CIN. CIN has been recognized for decades as a significant adverse event following PCI, associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality [1416]. Patients with ACS are at particularly high risk, as urgent procedures often preclude adequate pre-procedural hydration and optimization [14]. Identifying reliable predictors of CIN and adverse outcomes in this population therefore remains of major clinical interest [17, 18]. Similar mechanisms of renal injury related to contrast exposure and hemodynamic instability have also been reported in other high-risk populations, such as patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke [19].

Anemia, advanced age, and renal dysfunction have been consistently identified as risk factors for CIN and poor outcomes after PCI [2022]. In our cohort of 1,465 patients with ACS, low hemoglobin concentration, older age, and male sex were independently associated with higher mortality. These findings are in line with prior evidence indicating that reduced hematocrit is an important determinant of CIN and adverse prognosis [21, 22].

Beyond traditional risk factors, recent research has highlighted the prognostic potential of novel biomarkers such as the FIB-4 index. Originally developed to estimate hepatic fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis, FIB-4 has emerged as a broader marker of systemic inflammation and metabolic stress. In large ACS populations, elevated FIB-4 values have been associated with higher in-hospital mortality, greater incidence of heart failure, and increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [23, 24]. Similarly, in our study, higher FIB-4 was linked to increased rates of CIN, rehospitalization, and both short- and long-term mortality.

Our results are consistent with prior analyses suggesting that elevated FIB-4 reflects not only hepatic injury but also vascular dysfunction, endothelial activation, and systemic inflammation – all of which may predispose to kidney injury and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. He et al. demonstrated that FIB-4 independently predicted CIN in over 5,600 ACS patients undergoing coronary interventions [25], while Liu et al. confirmed its long-term prognostic value in more than 4,000 patients with ischemic heart disease [26]. These observations, together with our findings, indicate that FIB-4 may represent an integrated marker of patient frailty and multisystem dysfunction rather than a liver-specific index.

The apparent inverse association between baseline creatinine and 1-year mortality in our model likely reflects multicollinearity with eGFR rather than a true protective effect. This finding emphasizes the importance of cautious model interpretation when correlated renal indices are included simultaneously.

Altogether, the emerging evidence supports the potential utility of FIB-4 in refining risk stratification among ACS patients undergoing invasive procedures. Nevertheless, given the retrospective and single-center nature of our analysis, these results should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.

Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, this was a retrospective, single-center study, which inherently limits the ability to infer causality and may introduce unmeasured confounding. Second, data on the etiology of potential chronic liver disease (e.g., alcohol-related vs. non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) were not available. FIB-4 was therefore analyzed as a surrogate of systemic and hepatic fibrosis rather than as a direct measure of liver pathology. Third, information on baseline frailty and the chronic use of nephroprotective or nephrotoxic medications – including SGLT2 inhibitors, NSAIDs, or ACE inhibitors – was lacking. These factors may have influenced both renal outcomes and mortality. Fourth, liver enzymes (AST and ALT) were not routinely available in all ACS patients, possibly leading to selection bias toward individuals with more complete laboratory data. Fifth, detailed angiographic characteristics (culprit lesion, presence of multivessel disease, staged PCI) were not captured, precluding procedural-level risk assessment. In summary, the predictive value of FIB-4 should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in prospective multicenter studies. The FIB-4 index takes age into account, which is why it was excluded from multivariate models due to collinearity; the impact of FIB-4 is not adjusted for age.

Conclusions

In patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI, elevated FIB-4 index values were associated with a higher incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, increased hospitalization rates, and greater short- and long-term mortality. FIB-4 may therefore serve as a simple, non-invasive marker integrating hepatic and systemic factors that contribute to poor prognosis in ACS.

However, given the retrospective nature of the analysis and incomplete data on liver disease, frailty, and medication use, these findings should be interpreted with caution. The observed association does not establish causality but supports further exploration of FIB-4 as an adjunctive risk indicator in future prospective studies.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethical approval from the Bioethics Committee of the Świętokrzyskie Medical Chamber in Kielce (approval no. SIL.BK/1/2023).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Shacham Y, Gal-Oz A, Leshem-Rubinow E, et al. Acute kidney injury among ST elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous intervention: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Int J Cardiol 2014; 177: 578–80.

2 

Pruc M, Kubica J, Banach M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic performance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of 90 studies including 45 990 patients. Kardiol Pol 2024; 82: 276–84.

3 

Pruc M, Peacock FW, Rafique Z, et al. The prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 6903.

4 

Pruc M, Kubica J, Banach M, et al. Prognostic value of the monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kardiol Pol 2025; 83: 52–61.

5 

Zhang H, Hu L, Li Q, et al. Prognostic value of red cell distribution width in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103: e37521.

6 

Chen L, Liu P, Feng Z, et al. Association of red blood cell distribution width with mortality risk in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2024; 3: 100456.

7 

Gaggini M, Minichilli F, Gorini F, et al. FIB-4 index and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as death predictors in coronary artery disease patients. Biomedicines 2023; 11: 76.

8 

Cordero A, Escribano D, Quintanilla MA, et al. Prognostic value of the fibrosis-4 index in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 1983.

9 

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Section 4: contrast-induced AKI. Kidney Int Suppl 2012; 2: 69–88.

10 

Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 267–315.

11 

Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569–619.

12 

Siudak Z, Hawranek M, Kleczyński P, et al. Interventional cardiology in Poland in 2022. Annual summary report of the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society (AISN PTK) and Jagiellonian University Medical College. Adv Interv Cardiol 2023; 19: 82–5.

13 

Siudak Z, Grygier M, Tomaniak M, et al. Interventional cardiology in Poland in 2023. Annual summary report of the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society (AISN PTK) and Jagiellonian University Medical College. Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20: 379–81.

14 

Marenzi G, Lauri G, Assanelli E, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1780–5.

15 

Silvain J, Nguyen LS, Spagnoli V, et al. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 2018; 104: 767–72.

16 

Lang J, Patyna S, Büttner S, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prognostic impact of acute kidney injury after coronary angiography and intervention in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center retrospective analysis. Adv Interv Cardiol 2020; 16: 58–64.

17 

Chong E, Poh KK, Liang S, et al. Comparison of risks and clinical predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing emergency versus nonemergency percutaneous coronary interventions. J Interv Cardiol 2010; 23: 451–9.

18 

Rakowski T, Dziewierz A, Węgiel M, et al. Risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Kardiol Pol 2022; 80: 760–4.

19 

Wrona P, Sawczyńska K, Wróbel D, et al. Risk factors of acute kidney injury during hospitalization in acute ischaemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20: 89–94.

20 

McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, et al. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997; 103: 368–75.

21 

Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Lasic Z, et al. Low hematocrit predicts contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 706–13.

22 

Sreenivasan J, Zhuo M, Khan MS, et al. Anemia (hemoglobin ≤ 13 g/dL) as a risk factor for contrast-induced acute kidney injury following coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2018; 122: 961–5.

23 

Cordero A, Escribano D, Quintanilla MA, et al. Prognostic value of liver fibrosis assessed by the FIB-4 index in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol 2023; 76: 618–25.

24 

Song J, Liu Y, Chen J, et al. Fibrosis-4 stage of liver fibrosis predicts cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023; 195: 110206.

25 

He HM, He C, You ZB, et al. Non-invasive liver fibrosis scores are associated with contrast-associated acute kidney injury in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology 2023; 74: 333–43.

26 

Liu HH, Cao YX, Jin JL, et al. Liver fibrosis scoring systems as novel tools for predicting cardiovascular outcomes in patients following elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10: e018869.

Copyright: © 2025 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.